James Hind is ‘indirectly’ abusing my children.

Child abuse comes in many forms and guises.

Sexual, physical and emotional child abuse destroys lives.

I fundamentally disagree with James Hind’s assertion that naming Child X in the Wilfred Wong Kidnap case, is “a form of childabuse,” for the simple reason that no harm came to the child as a result.

It was only sold as “a form of child abuse,” to justify Hind’s satanic agenda of ruining the lives, of anyone he deems a “Satan hunter.”

James Hind is dangerously peculiar in my opinion.

Whereas when James Hind publicly publishes comments, which can be read by my children and my children’s friends, its directly causing them emotional distress to see and hear people calling for their father to be imprisoned.

It is a form of child abuse.

Having no sympathy for your victims, is a sure fire sign of being a psychopath.

2 thoughts on “James Hind is ‘indirectly’ abusing my children.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s